Your view isn't any more valid than mine. No matter what weak arguments you employ.I never said go back to EO. I said visit Null. Mobile must appeal to EVE Echoes ISK a more casual viewer or it doesn't survive.Also, when probes have been in, those low-sec mission runners aren't safe.Once warp bubbles are in, these haulers are not safe if you set up far enough in the gate.Plenty of easy phone games out there. Take your choice.

Staring in your display for a bunch of jumps isn't hard either. It is just boring. All the rad af Eve players do not seem to understand or are strawmanning the true problem people have with all the change. Traveling is dull, not difficult. What made it not dull was not having to be accessible for it.Why is it difficult to stay in secure zones and create money there? Like the EVE world is pretty big, there's a lot to do without danger and you can let people play with the risk way as well. Why does it need to be the way only, rather than both?But what is there to do in safe zones? That would suck.

It is possible to visit non sec and still be protected, the gates and bases there nevertheless have guards. It is only nul sec that's the matter, because there isn't any law.I do not find the issue. Null sec is where the top rewards are in the game and should be the area with the highest risk. Why would you be traveling deep in to null in case you do not live there? If you're day tripping to EVE Mobile ISK Cheap run sites, accept the risk and don't go so deep you want to autopilot. If you would like to live there, then join a fantastic corp/alliance that permeates the region and can make it safe for you.If that is not casual enough, then stay is low or hi sec at which you may get a higher degree of safety. Utilize the delivery system if you would like to offload what small risk there would be to other players.You can afk travel safely in even the most ignorant ships.In high security space.It is not a bait and switch.