Because regardless of the opinion, this remains 100% a business and marketing maneuver. If they really wanted to do something positive, they could do it without advertising their merchandise while doing this. As it's not genuine. This is not any different than the Mut 21 coins coronavirus commercials. They could have said nothing at all. Instead, they brought positive attention to the protests. That's good. Solidarity or else they realize a nice chunk of the audience is preoccupied with something more important than a damn videogame? Man. These remarks really highlight the nihilistic character of reddit users. Yes, this is a company. Yes, it has something to do with marketing. However, Jesus, can't we be glad that companies are saying something? Do you not know just how much of an impact this could create? In the event the firm ignored the circumstance, it might give every checked out thoughts the idea that what is happening is ordinary and routine.

EA does not care for people who aren't investors. Removing Kaepernick's name from tunes in Madden 2 years in a row shows it. Companies do not want one to defend themlet their attorneys do this work. I'm all for calling a spade a spade and being happy when I'm surprised by something like this. But we shouldn't praise a business for attaining the absolute bare minimum. You aren't cool and moral for thanking companies for not spitting on you. We should praise firms who show patterns of pleasure. Feel free to disagree, but don't act like this specific case is this incredibly complex morally-grey situation. I mean I believed there were pretty strict regulations on whose titles and likeliness can be used in Madden. Just like Belicheck and Payton aren't in Madden because they aren't a part of the NFLCA and that's who EA has a contract with. They might have to cover Kap if his title is used and therefore are likely avoiding that. That and Kap is not just welcome from the NFL planet (not speaking about lovers ) anymore.

They both backpeddled and apologized when they were called out. They don't have rights to Kap's likeness in the game but they could mention him in the tune (as they have plenty of other public figures in different tunes ). The simple fact that they did this 2 years in a row suggests it wasn't an innocent oversight but a genuine choice to collaborate using a essentially racist act of collusion inside the NFL. I'm not defending a provider. I am not saying EA is a bastion of justice. Many people in general (not just reddit) can't see beyond black and white. That's why negativity floats to the top in all social media. Cynicism inspires outrage and outrage inspires clicks. This is a significant element. Youtube for one has completed studies, since it's a massive portion of their business and they want to know it. There's been testimony to congress about it that I've watched but can't find at this time. What they need is engagement and the more negatively framed something is the more people will click it when it comes up in your recommendations.

Businesses do not need you to defend themlet their attorneys do this work. "Firms do not need you to defend them", but attacking businesses when they're doing the right thing is essential and productive?It doesn't matter whether it's for PR reasons, they're still raising awareness to this issue and hurting nobody by doing this procedure. Meanwhile the people who see this as an opportunity to attack are only perpetuating a negative feeling of constant complaining. It is not so much about"protecting businesses" but about attacking this naturally negativity. So you are really only adding to the man's argument by doing exactly what he described. They are not doing anything though. They simply published a statement full of buy Madden nfl 21 coins empty rhetoric. You understand what doing something is? Not making another Madden game because the NFL penalized players enjoy Kaepernick for carrying a knee. That would be impressive. But we are all aware that's not what is going to happen.