Why not support them in doing both? Words are actions, in many cases. Putting out a statement of Mut 21 coins belief such as this isn't simple. I'd hope they are also doing stuff items to make the lives of the black workers better but that doesn't mean I need to take care of this as meaningless. Putting out a public statement is really a fantastic step forwards for initiatives such as that, because if EA isn't doing enough then it's really easy for people tirelessly to say"Look, our activities are materially distinct from our stated values and we ought to do something about that."

In the end of the day if you refuse to admit when a company creates a little step you appreciate then how do they ever learn how to generate a large step you love? You're treating this like a political discussion where earning this small concession means you won't have the bargaining power to make a bigger one in the future. But I don't think that is how this works: EA is testing the waters and learning from their customers whether this is the kind of thing they support or not. Is the lesson you would like them to understand from all this that human decency isn't worth appealing to because it does not actually affect purchasing decisions?

I believe according to your comment that we are going to essentially disagree on idealism vs. realism, and that is fine. I find myself generally at the middle of realism and idealism since I know how the world works but I want a better universe; you do not have to select one or the other. I don't know why we need to give corporations a pass just because they aren't individuals (that Citizens United would disagree with but that's another argument.)

We shouldn't only accept the best we are given by a company, we ought to anticipate the best we need out of them. Companies are made of humans calling the shots and you will find an infinite number of examples of companies that both make enormous profits and stand up for great causes. Patagonia is a great example. They do not need to make sustainable goods and supply repair and reuse applications to go against quickly fashion, but they do and they make a ton of money .

This instance doesn't include the many gray topics where opinions have a place; this is literally a discussion of whether you want black folks to have faith or not. It is not courageous of a company to state that black people deserve rights just because they will lose white supremacist clients. It actually is quite easy for a company to put out a statement of belief like this, as we have seen from all of the companies doing this at this time like Amazon and the NFL. I genuinely do not know how it's difficult to get a multi-million dollar company to give up a tiny fraction of the profits for the larger good. If people who do not like Black Lives Issue constitute a majority of buy Madden 21 coins a company's customerbase, then maybe they should not have those profits (not asserting EA's playerbase in against BLM, this is a hyperbolized example)